![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
STEM CELL, in developmental biology, an unspecialized cell
that is capable of reproducing itself for long periods and of
differentiating, through the activation or inactivation of various
genes, into specialized cells making up the organs and tissues of the body. At the beginning of the 21st century, many scientists believed that research on human stem cells offered extraordinary potential for advances in biological knowledge and in the treatment of a variety of diseases. Pluripotent and Multipotent. Cells that can renew themselves but give rise to just a single mature cell type are also sometimes referred to as stem cells; they are said to be “unipotent.”
A distinction is made between embryonic and adult stem cells. Embryonic stem cells are derived from the so-called inner cell mass found in embryos a few days old and are cultured in the laboratory. So-called embryonic germ cells, which are derived from primordial reproductive cells (progenitors of egg and sperm cells) in a five- to ten-week-old fetus, are similar in some regards to embryonic stem cells and are also under intensive study. Both embryonic stem cells and embryonic germ cells are pluripotent. Adult stem cells,
obtained from developed tissue (regardless of the age of the organism),
appear by and large to be multipotent or unipotent. They give rise to
specialized cells needed by the body for tissue regeneration after the organism develops beyond the embryonic stage, and they generally produce cell
types found in the tissue in which they reside. Evidence suggests that at least some adult stem cells
may possess a degree of plasticity; that is, it may be possible under
certain conditions to genetically reprogram them in the laboratory to
produce specialized cells other than those found in the tissue in which the stem cells originated. Adult stem cells, however, occur relatively rarely in the body and are less readily grown in quantity in laboratory cultures than are embryonic stem cells.
Stem cells have been extensively studied in mice. Scientists learned in the 1960s that certain mouse cells could develop into multiple tissue types, and stem cells were identified in mice in 1971. Ten years later, researchers reported success in growing mouse embryonic stem cells in the laboratory.
Preliminary study of the developmental flexibility of stem cells, especially embryonic stem cells, raised hopes that they would find numerous applications in scientific research
and medical treatment. It seemed possible that they could be used to
study chromosome abnormalities in early stages of development; to
provide tissues for testing experimental drugs; to carry genes to
specific body tissues; or to create replacements for faulty organs and
tissues in such conditions as spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, PARKINSON"S disease, ALZHEIMER"S disease, type 1 diabetes, chronic heart disease, end-stage kidney disease, liver failure, and cancer. Such practical medical applications of stem cells, may still be years away. Considerable basic research on the process of cell
differentiation and specialization remains to be done, and serious
concerns must be addressed, including the possibility that a cell
transplant might carry a virus or provoke an immunological reaction in
the receiving body. Nonetheless, researchers have reported intriguing,
and promising, findings. In late 2007, for instance, it was announced
that induced pluripotent stem cells had been used in devising a therapy for a form of sickle-cell disease in mice.
Basic research on human stem cells and exploration of their possible applications require access to an ample supply of the cells from a variety of genetically diverse viable cell lines. Many researchers believe pluripotent stem cells to be potentially the most promising for medical applications, but traditionally such cells
have been obtained (at least originally) from an embryo or fetus in a
way that entails the embryo or fetus’s destruction. This fact touches
on ethical issues concerning abortion.
For people who believe human personhood begins at conception, the
destruction of an embryo or fetus involves the taking of a human life
and is therefore presumptively wrong. But many argue that the embryo
should not be regarded as a human life or, even so, that its
destruction is justified by a greater good—potentially life-saving
medical advances—that may result. It may be possible to sidestep this
disputed issue if researchers’ efforts to find alternative sources of
fully functional pluripotent cells yield practical fruits. One possibility might be the use of induced pluripotent stem cells. Another might be the development of nondestructive techniques for extraction of stem cells from embryos; a report claiming experimental success in this approach appeared in early 2008. Additional issues also figure in the stem cell debate. For example, many people are opposed to the cloning of humans, a technology that conceivably could be used to produce embryos to supply stem cells. Another question is whether at least the extra embryos often created in the course of in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures may ethically be used as a source of stem cells;
such embryos are generally either discarded or placed in frozen
storage. A further issue is the morality of using IVF specifically for
the purpose of producing embryos for stem cell research rather than for creating a new human life. Seeking to allay ethical concerns while still allowing some federal funding of research potentially valuable for human life and health, U.S. President GEORGE W. Bush in 2001 decided to support federal funding of embryonic stem cell research only for projects using stem cell lines that already existed at that time. For these cell lines, said Bush, “the life and death decision has already been made.” Bush determined that for such cell
lines to be used, they had to meet certain other criteria as well: they
were derived from embryos that had been created for reproductive
purposes and were no longer needed; informed consent was obtained for
the donation of the embryo; and the donation did not involve financial
inducements. The Bush administration policy did not, however, bar or
restrict private organizations or nonfederal government bodies from
using their own funds to use stem cells for research.
In November 2004, California voters approved Proposition 71, providing
$300 million in state funds annually over a 10-year period to fund
embryonic stem cell research in that state. Several other states have also authorized funding for stem cell research. New York, for example, in 2007 established a special revenue fund, called the Empire State Stem Cell
Trust, to distribute grants, earmarking $100 million for the first
fiscal year and $50 million for each year of the following decade. At the time Bush made his determination, most countries had few or no
restrictions on scientific study of human embryos. In January 2001,
Britain explicitly legalized stem cell research on human embryos and also authorized the use of cloning to create embryos for such research. In July 2006, Congress passed, but President Bush vetoed, a measure that would have permitted federally funded research on stem cell
lines from surplus embryos that fertility clinics planned to discard.
The veto, the first of his presidency, was sustained in the House of
Representatives. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||